Welcome to the Question2Answer Q&A. There's also a demo if you just want to try it out.
  • Register
Welcome to the Q&A for Question2Answer.

If you have questions about the platform, click here to ask and please use English.

If you just want to try Q2A, please use the demo, which also grants admin access.

Apr 29: Q2A 1.5.2

Related questions

Voting for anybody (non-registered)

+3 votes
Why isn't there such an option @ permissions?

I would like to give non-registered users also the option to vote for questions.

Can someone help me out?
asked Jul 2, 2011 in Q2A Core by Aslan
The likely answer is it would be too open to abuse.
commented Jul 4, 2011 by DisgruntledGoat

1 Answer

0 votes
Indeed, it's feels too open to abuse. But if there is a lot of demand for it, I can think about how to implement it as safely as possible.
answered Jul 5, 2011 by gidgreen
Show 4 previous comments
Me also - it would be good to have this option. IMO the admin should be conscious of abuse threat, but still be able to enable such a function.
Useful for me.
commented Feb 3 by Krzysztof Kielce
Even if it's just implemented as IP or cookie-based virtual anonymous users, that'd be fine. The potential for abuse will always be there, but it's something individual site admins can decide to deal with or not.

Pretty, pretty please consider this feature?
commented Feb 17 by Roger Tuan
Powered by Question2Answer